Article Text

other Versions

PDF
Discrimination accuracy between real and sham press needles in the hands
  1. Sungha Kim1,2,
  2. Sanghun Lee2,
  3. Sunmi Choi2,
  4. Jeonghwan Park2,
  5. Sungchul Kim3
  1. 1Korean Medicine Life Science, University of Science and Technology, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
  2. 2Korea Medicine Fundamental Research Division, Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
  3. 3Department of Acupuncture & Moxibustion, Wonkwang University Gwangju Medical Hospital, Gwangju, Republic of Korea
  1. Correspondence to Dr Sungchul Kim, Department of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, Wonkwang University Gwangju Medical Hospital, Gwangju, 503-310, Republic of Korea; kscndl{at}hanmail.net

Abstract

Objectives To evaluate the blinding effectiveness of a modified blunt sham press needle on the basis of the ability of subjects to discriminate between real and sham acupuncture needles compared with their discrimination ability based on pure guessing, and to define differences between senses (touch and vision) in the rates of correctly identified needles.

Methods Sixty-three healthy students and staff members were recruited through convenience sampling. First, real or sham acupuncture was randomly administered to the left LI4 point while subjects could not observe the needle tip. A real or sham needle tip was then shown to the subjects. Finally, a random combination of real or sham acupuncture needles were randomly administered to the left and right LI4 points, this time with the subjects observing the procedure. In all conditions the subjects gave their judgement as Yes or No in response to questions asking them to identify the needle type. The proportion of correct judgements (P(C)) was computed for the last part of the trial in left and right LI4 points, and the rates of correctly identified needles for each trial were obtained.

Results The subjects’ accuracy of discrimination between the real and sham acupuncture needles in left and right LI4 points was not significantly different from that based on pure guess (P(C)=0.50 (chance level)), which indicates complete inability to discriminate between needles. The rates of correctly identified needles using touch, vision and a combination of both senses were not significantly different (p=0.807).

Conclusions The findings from this study show that this sham acupuncture device successfully blinded subjects to real and sham press needles, suggesting that it is effective for subject blinding in studies on acupuncture using press needles, and facilitating evaluation of the effects of acupuncture in placebo-controlled trials using a rigorous scientific research methodology.

  • ACUPUNCTURE

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.