rss
Acupunct Med 2009;27:70-72 doi:10.1136/aim.2009.000810
  • Debate

NICE guideline on osteoarthritis: is it fair to acupuncture? No

  1. Adrian White
  1. Adrian White, Peninsula Medical School, N32 ITTC Building, Tamar Science Park, Plymouth PL6 8BX, UK; Adrian.white{at}pms.ac.uk

    Abstract

    A new guideline on the care and management of osteoarthritis has recently been published by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, and makes wide-ranging and authoritative recommendations. The guideline states that there is insufficient evidence to recommend acupuncture. There appears to be three areas where the guidelines may have not used the available evidence in the most appropriate manner. First, data on the long-term effectiveness of acupuncture may have been misinterpreted. Second, the specific rejection of electroacupuncture indicates a restricted understanding of acupuncture as a treatment, and is based on a cost-effectiveness analysis which may not be ideal. Third, the cost-effectiveness calculations used comparisons with sham acupuncture (“placebo”) when comparison with standard care would have been more appropriate. The guideline may therefore lead some patients with osteoarthritis to miss out on a treatment that may be effective for them.

    Footnotes

    • Competing interests: The author is employed by the British Medical Acupuncture Society, a not-for-profit organisation, as editor of this journal.

    Register for free content

    The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

    Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.